Thursday, November 13, 2014

#Breaking the Internet

(of the negativity cycle surrounding women and their sexuality)


When J.Law and company had their private, nude photos hacked and leaked onto the internet a few months ago, there was some serious anger. Not so much anger at the criminals who hacked into these women’s accounts, violating their basic rights - that’s actually the kind of anger I can get behind. No, the anger that surfaced was toward the victims. Oh sure, it was couched in “concern about internet safety”, but the more honest criticism sounded like: "If you don't want nude photos leaked, don't take nude photos." Right. Like if you don't want to be strangled, don't have a neck.

Interestingly, criticism was mostly a by women, about women kind of thing. Women don't like it when naked ladies go mainstream.

And now, we have Kim Kardashian, and the full frontal heard round the world. Oh yeah, panties are in a tightly wound bunch, so to speak. It is hard to consume any social media without hearing how "Nasty" and "Disgusting" Kim Kardashian is. Again, most of the anger coming from women.

I am not a fan of KK, but I found the picture both interesting and funny. Naked women don't make me angry, but with all the hoo-hah I thought maybe I was missing something, so I considered the criticism....

"She needs to respect her body."

First of all, she doesn't NEED to do anything. She is a grown woman, not breaking any laws. Secondly, I think she is respecting her body. She is not talking smack about it, she is not harming it, and she seems to be celebrating it with pride. Hiding under a hoodie and self-hate doesn't mean you respect your body.

"What about the children!!?"

Yes, with the prevalence of this photo, it is very possibly going to be seen by young eyes. Then again. it is just a woman without clothes. This should really not be scarring. I also heard a mother angry because Kim Kardashian was now a terrible role model. I can honestly say this photo did nothing to change Kim Kardashian's status as a role model in my eyes. If you want a role model for the little ones you love, try Eleanor Roosevelt or Malala Yousafzai.

"She is a mom!!!"

Right, because when you become a mom - that is all you are. Not a celebrity, entrepreneur, lover, or owner of an ass. Again, the picture is not one of KK ripping the wings off bugs; she is not doing anything harmful in these photos. When her kid sees these one day, he will likely roll his eyes and say "Mommmm!" And end of scene.

"It's plastic!"

There is a lot of speculation about surgical enhancements that may have contributed to the striking nature of the photo. I don't know if it is the case or not, and it is really none of my business. People have uniquely shaped bodies and some chose to sculpt their bodies with silicone. Again, no puppies are dying here.

"It is Photoshopped!"

Yes, I am sure it is. That is how magazine art is created. The lighting and make-up are also part of the art of the picture. Kim wasn't just walking around in a sequined gown in her kitchen when she noticed a plain brown backdrop and thought "Hmmm…. I am going to pour myself a glass of champagne!"
It is an illusion; a fantasy. Photoshop is a creative tool. Let's assume all magazine covers are Photoshopped and move on.

"She is doing it for attention!"

Yes, that is what celebrities do.

"It is not classy. It is just trashy."

I get that you feel that way, so you should certainly not pose nude for magazines or balance things on your butt - but please, just zip it. Is it classy to make negative comments about a person’s body or her choice?

"She is just doing it for money. Like she needs it!"

I don't know what Kim Kardashian needs or does not need, but I do know that I would rather pose for pictures where I was compensated and had a choice than have photos stolen from me and published without my consent.

"She is a vapid, no-talent reflection of society's celebrity-mongering."

Maybe. But here we all are - talking about her.

So, since I have not heard a compelling argument about why I should be grossed-out by a naked woman with a big ass in a magazine, I am left to speculate about why many women find this so unsettling.

KarenPoursCoffee2
Is it because we feel insecure when we look at perfectly lit, stunning bodies? Is it because we get jealous when others – maybe our partners - covet them? Are we resentful because we have to play within the confines of decorum, while the likes of Kim Kardashian do as they please under perfect Hollywood lighting? Do we hate "sluts", or anyone who gives "slutty messages"? It this because sexual freedom is not something we think we can achieve? Do we think women who seek attention are dangerous?

I don't know the answers to any of these questions. All I know is that balancing cups on your ass is hard, and I need another coffee.

4 comments:

  1. I read an article just this morning with another take, that she's the "Butt" of a racist joke. My own feeling about that article is that while I think the author is a zillion more times brilliant than Kim Kardashian, I'm not sure I agree with them. I think this photo is just a photo, nothing more. She did it for free just to work with the iconic photographer. I don't think race has anything at all to do with the picture.

    Since I know you personally, Girl, I know it's not really fair to say this, but damn, I'd take having coffee with you over champagne with KK. I know we would have a better conversation. Clothed or not! ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  2. And great insights, jeezuss, it's nice to read some sanity, and real horse sense. Smart. (Your kids are lucky.)

    They are fabulous photos, and they are so French. But you really capture American provincialism. It's like fracking. We've been doing it since 1949, and now it's a problem? Sometimes I think the American mind is like a field of savannah grass, then a decadal wind picks up and the grass stands at attention looking ENE or SE. So everyone becomes a vegetarian.

    Wait until Americans discover that the seminal science discoveries we think some smart Europeans discovered (e.g: Galileo, Kepler, Copernicus) came from Islamic Science. What is that going to do to them? Anyone interested can get a jump on that by looking up Robert Briffault’s “The Making of Humanity” (1919) here: https://archive.org/stream/makingofhumanity00brifrich#page/n7/mode/2up
    Save time. Start on page 188 and read in shock for 20 pages. Also read 176-177. Briffault wasn’t alone, btw, Joseph McCabe wrote about it, too, in 1938/40.

    I read this piece on HuffPo originally. Karen, you are one level-headed woman. Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Personally, I think you killed it in your photo!

    I realized how much I agree with you on all points when my 14 yo son revealed he had seen her photo on Twitter (really?), and my feeling about it was So What? It's a naked body. There should be no embarrassment associated with seeing it. And without a doubt, she's beautiful, the epitome of what a man would want in a woman.

    But I take some comfort in counting the many ways she and we could never be compared. Unless the average women has the time and money for enhancements, spray tans and complete hair removal!

    ReplyDelete